top of page

High Performance Racal Dana Counter Timer OCXO Upgrade

Racal1998.jpg

Its strange how you get attached to bits of equipment you used when you were a young engineer. In the BBC Transmitter Department, we had various flavours of Racal Dana Frequency counters for our field visits. Some some were the older 9913 and 9916 units but my favourite was the 1998 Frequency counter and I always wanted one.
 

So a few years ago I spotted a Racal Dana 1998 Frequency Counter for sale on eBay. It looked in cosmetically good condition but was reported to have the usual stuck buttons problem. Now knowing that the buttons are notoriously difficult to get hold of (you can buy a sort-of equivalent) I decided to take a different route for repair. I also spotted someone selling parts from 1998 counter including the front panel PCB. Thinking that I may be able to exchange working and not-working buttons, I purchased the spare front panel.

​

When the counter arrived, it was covered in the usual asset and "out of date" CAL stickers and it was a bit dirty but it looked good. A good clean and some IPA to get rid of the bits of glue, what was revealed was a counter in near mint cosmetic condition. A real find.

But, as described, just about every front panel button was jammed or not working. No surprise there.  

However, the replacement front panel board had perfectly working buttons. All of them in perfect condition with a nice positive action. The only difference is the failed ones had black bodies and the ones on the separate board had white bodies. Otherwise, they looked the same.  Had the button supplier updated the design? Had I "lucked out" and simply purchased a newer board and this one will ultimately fail, who knows? Time will tell.

 

However, it was a simple case of swapping the boards over and my £25 spare from eBay just worked first time. At least I have the old board (below) as a spare for other failures.

IMG_3144.jpg

Over the past few years, the counter has been used in my workshop providing sterling service. But I quickly realised that the internal 10MHz reference was dreadful. So I needed to use the counter externally locked to my Datum GPS Disciplined 10MHz source to make any reasonable measurements.

​

A quick google revealed there are a number of options for the internal 10MHz reference for the Racal Dana 19xx series counters.

  • 04A Ovened Oscillator 3x10 E-9

  • 04B High Stability Ovened Oscillator 5x10E-10

  • 04C Unovened Oscillator 1x10 E-6

  • 04E Ultra High Stability Ovened Oscillator 5x10E-10

  • 04R Rubidium Oscillator 5x10E-11

  • 04STD Standard Crystal Timebase 2x10E-6

  • 04T TCXO Timebase 3x10E-7

 

So what option was fitted to mine? Well it turns out to be the "04C", a 1E-6 un-ovened crystal oscillator (pictured below). And it was just awful. Really difficult to adjust with the trimmer capacitor and getting to the 1E6 specification took a steady hand and it would not stay there long. Heaven only knows what the cheaper "04STD" was like!!!

IMG_3145.jpg

This got me thinking.  Can I make my own board approaching the performance of the Racal Dana option "04A" ovened oscillator with a stability of 3E-9? 

​

I then remembered one of Tony Albus's YouTube videos where he was comparing some ex-equipment OCXOs. Tony's excellent video can be found here. It is well worth your time checking out Tony's content as he releases excellent content around frequency and time metrology.

As a result of Tony's good work I decided to take a look at the CTi OSC5A2B02 OCXO. The reason I chose this version is that the original Racal Dana module outputs a "sort of" square wave and this model of the CTI OCXO also outputs a similar amplitude signal.

 

The Specification for the CTi OSC5A2B02 OCXO module (below) is here: CTi OSC5A2B02 Specification PDF
 

CTi OSC5A2B02.jpg

I went ahead purchased a batch of 5 CTi OSC5A2B02 OCXO modules and tested them in turn. In agreement with Tony's work, they seem to draw about 450mA whilst warming up and stabilise at around 200mA. As the counters PSU is already designed for ovened oscillators and rubidium plug-ins, there is no problem with the counter powering these little OCXOs.

 

Looking at the output of the original "04C" crystal oscillator option, the output was a highly distorted "square" wave of about 4V amplitude. The CTi OSC5A2B02 OCXO module output (seen below) claims to be HCMOS and gave a much better square wave output of about 5v. The yellow scope trace below is the OSC5A2B02 output and the purple trace is my 10MHz from my Datum time source.

scope trace.jpg

My next test was to see how far you could adjust the CTi OSC5A2B02 OCXO. They have a Vref pin which according to the specification sheet can be adjusted between 0v and 4v DC which "trims" the output 10MHz output frequency.​​


On the batch of 5 OCXOs that I had, the Vref needed to be set anywhere between 1.8V and 2.2V (module depending) to get the OCXO in phase with the 10MHz output of my Datum GPS disciplined oscillator.

​

Picking one of my sample OCXO's from "the middle of the pack", I popped it on my TinyPFA frequency and phase analyser to see what its voltage trim characteristics looked like.

​

On this particular OCXO, to get close to zero Hz error compared to the GPSDO, this sample module needed 1.916V on the frequency reference trim adjustment. 

​

I then carried out a voltage step change of the reference trim by ±10mV and ±100mV and measured the resultant frequency shift which can be seen below.
 

​

​​

​

​

​

 

​

​

​

​

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Now ignoring the absolute values as this will change somewhat module by module, as a rule of thumb, they seem to shift circa 10mHz per mV of adjustment if you intend to base your own projects around them.

 

This sets some good rules for any reference voltage circuit to set the tuning of modules.

​

But having the Vref stable is not the only consideration. How susceptible are they to supply voltage?

 

The oscillator modules are powered from a 5V rail from the main PSU in the counter. But does supply tolerance make a difference?

Well the specification sheet suggests the output is good to ±2E-9 for a 5% supply variation. Presumably this is whilst holding the Vref pin very accurately. After I stabilised a module, I used TimeLab and my phase and frequency analyser to look for frequency changes vs supply voltage variation.

​

Please excuse the Frequency Difference Chart below as its a bit busy with annotations.

 

I carried out the test over 1000 seconds. Starting at 5V, I altered the OCXO supply down to 4.75V, back up to 5V, then to 5.25V and finished back at 5V. The Vref pin was held at 1.916V.

​

What seems to happen is after a supply voltage change, the module seems to spend around 90 seconds settling. The other thing to note is over the whole test, the peak to peak variation is only 22mHz. The effect of any supply voltage variation is very small.

​​

But from my measurements below, the +0.25V supply voltage change introduced +4E-10 of variation after settling and the -0.25V change introduced a -7E-10 change. Well within the modules quoted specification of ±2E-9.

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​


 

 

 

 

 

​

Ok what about frequency stability? I allowed the module to run for number of hours and trimmed the reference voltage to be aligned with my GPSDO. Then using TimeLab, I monitored the frequency/phase drift over a period of one hour.

​

Over the hour long test, the OCXO has some short term wander seen in the frequency difference measurement. But his is very small with the peak to peak wander at just 5.15mHz. But putting trace trend on to the results, this resulted in an average drift over the hour long test of just 0.5mHz. (Yes 0.5 milli-Hertz). This is remarkably good for a such a cheap OCXO module.​​​​​

​

10mV and 100mV ref volt step test annotated.JPG
Supply Variation.jpg
1 Hour Drift.jpg

Another way to look at this is to measure the Phase difference of the OCXO compared to the GPS Disciplined source over time. The measurement below is "Zero based" so at T=0, the measurement treats the signals as in phase. Then the phase analyser measure the change over the one hour long test.

​

In this case the change in phase was 727nS. Or in terms of slope, a remarkable -2E-10 sec/sec.

Capture9.JPG

​The next task was to install this OCXO into the Racal 19xx series counters in the same form factor as the original crystal oscillators.

 

To ensure you get close to the performance figures above,  any board design cannot rely on the 5V supply in the counter to derive the reference frequency adjustment trim voltage.

Therefore the Vref frequency adjustment needs to be very stable and of course adjustable. So I decided to base my design around the Diodes Incorporated AS431 three terminal adjustable regulator choosing the better specified part with 0.5% voltage tolerance. But more importantly, this device is very temperature stable. In the sort of operating temperature range that will be found in the counter (say 20 Degrees C to 60 Degrees C, the 2.5V reference in the chip only moves 1mV or 0.04%.

Also, from my testing on the oscillator samples I had on hand, 1.5V to 2.5V of tuning voltage range gave you more than enough range to trim any oscillator over a good range.

The specification of the OSC5A2B02 stated that the Vref voltage cannot exceed 4V.  But from my testing, you only needed between 1.5 and 2.5V to trim the oscillators. I settled with the circuit below. R8 (a 2K Bourn's 25 turn trimmer) gave plenty of adjustment and the ability to fine-tune the OCXO frequency.

​

Taking into account the temperature drift characteristics of the regulator and the fact that the adjustment is over a limited range, the expected drift between 20 degrees and 60 degrees on the Vref pin of the OCXO is just 0.4mV which equates to 4mHz variation or 4E-10 due to changes in internal temperature in the counter.

Trim CCT.JPG

From this point on,  the design of the PCB was very straightforward. The original oscillator PCB used a 5 way 0.1" pitch board-to-board socket which was was a standard MultiComp Pro part from Farnell. The board just needed a little extra 5V supply decoupling on the PCB input. Testing of the OSC5A2B02 OCXO showed that the HCMOS TTL output was perfect for driving the clock conditioning input of the Racal counter.

The 3D render of the PCB (front and back) can be seen below. You will note that this is Rev 1.2. With the original development revision of the board I had used a user contributed footprint for the OSC5A2B02 OCXO and the pin spacing was wrong. Also the positioning of the adjustment trimmer just needed moving to centre it in the adjustment hole in the rear of the counter. Otherwise, the performance was perfect from Revision 1.1.

Racal EDA.JPG

So what does the finished product look like? Below is the front and rear board views of the version I have had produced. it is a simple plug in replacement for the original simple crystal and TCXO options.

And a what the finished product looks like installed into my Racal Dana 1998 counter.

I suppose the final question is how good is the OCXO when stable and aligned in my counter?

 

I soak tested the board for 24 hours in my 1998 counter and then fed my known good 10MHz feed in from my Datum/Symmetricom ET6000 GPS Disciplined source. After 24 hours the OCXO was trimmed such that on the 20 second integration time, the frequency was 10.000000000 Hz. Observing over an 8 day period, the measured frequency had slowly moved down to 9.999999990 MHz or a drift of 10mHz in 8 days.
 

Comparing the reference output of the counter to the known 10MHz source on an oscilloscope, at the time of measurement, the OCXO drift was 30ns in 30 seconds or a 1ns/s drift. This equates to an accuracy of 1E-9. This was considerably better than our target specification.

According to the datasheet, the claimed ageing of the crystal is to be better than 0.5PPB per day. So on this 10MHz oscillator, the ageing should be better than 5mHz per day or 40mHz over 8 days. We have seen just 10mHz over this period and so I think this is just crystal ageing and it is over four times better than the claimed specification. Of course the results will more likely be a combination of all of the above. Ageing, temperature variations and the like.

However, ultimately the performance is significantly better than expected.


And the sales pitch!!  If you would like to buy one of our Racal 19xx counter/timer OCXO boards, they are available from our Accessories Shop Page here

 

Fitting Instructions
 

Fitting is easy and takes 10 minutes and you just need a small Posi-Drive/Philips screwdriver. Refer photos above to see where it fits into your counter.
 

  • Unplug the counter from its mains supply
     

  • Remove the rear bezel (2 screws) noting which way up the bezel was orientated as it only fits back on one way.
     

  • Slide off the case
     

  • The original reference PCB is mounted by a single screw and into a 5 pin header on the PCB.  Remove the screw and the original PCB taking care not to lose the screw and washer as you will need them.
     

  • Mount the new PCB into the counter as shown in the photo above and secure with the screw. The rear mounted adjustment trimmer need to point towards the back panel. Take care to make sure you have aligned all the pins on the main board with the socket on the new oscillator PCB.
     

  • Reassemble the case and rear bezel.

​

The oscillator PCBs are soak tested for 24 hours then aligned against our GNSS Disciplined 10MHz reference before shipping. If you need to adjust/trim further with a local 10MHz source you trust, the adjustment pot is accessible from the rear panel.

​​​

​

​

bottom of page